Видео

this is just a 2x2x2x1

you can just use the (3^d)-1 formula, d=dimension (-1 is for excluding core) 3d= 26 pieces + 1 core, 54 bidimensional stickers, 6 faces 2d= 8 pieces + 1 core, 12 unidimensional stickers, 4 faces 1d = 2 pieces + 1 core, 2 nulidimensional stickers, 2 faces 0d = 0 pieces + 1 core, 0 necunidimensional stickers, 0 faces -1d = -0.6̄ pieces + 1 core, -0.2̄ necbidimensional stickers, -2 faces -2d = -0.8̄ pieces + 1 core, -0.1̄4̄8̄ nectridimensional stickers, -4 faces -3d = -0.9̄6̄2̄ pieces + 1 core, -0.0̄7̄4̄ necquadridimensional stickers, -6 faces

i wonder what a hyperminx would look like

My brain hurts...

To make it very clear - this video talks about the 4 spatial dimensions. Our universe is actually 4 dimensional, but with 3 dimensions for space and 1 for time. _Btw. all objects are always moving at the speed of light, but 99,999...% of the speed is in the time dimension. However this still means that the faster you move in space, the slower time passes for you even if it's by very small fractions of time._

media.tenor.com/cIU63CGDhngAAAAM/platonic-solid.gif

Does it mean that Ma = Ra' La FW ? This would be similar to the 3d, where M = R' L x.

You know something I haven't seen explored yet? Additional time dimensions. So far, all the rubiks cubes you've been referring to work within 1 time dimension (ours). A 3x3x3 is actually a 3+1 dimensional cube (+1 being the 1 time dimension). So theoretically you could have a 3+2 dimensional cube which would have 2 different time axis that work independently. I really don't know how this would work, though.

Glad that third dimensional beings have found a way to see what us 4th dimensional beings experience when solving 3D puzzles

they hypercuber community is just a bunch if aliens that can understand the 4th dimension

I can’t wait for the physical 4d megaminx

amen brother

Waiting for 4x4x4x4

it took my 1454 moves to solve

Thank you for making this tutorial on how to solve the 2x2x2x2 it will really help when I get mine and learn to solve it

I love Heise method. Because it makes me think. I solve the cube instead of applying a bunch of rehearsed moves that I don't understand. Small detail: I am a mathematician. This means that I am biased towards anything that mentioned algebra. This method is not the best in terms of speed. It actually quite slow. But it is universal, as it can be applied to any rubik's style puzzle without any modifications. This does not mean that you should love it too. Not at all. It is a method for people who like math, algebra, and who just want to be able to solve the puzzle without memorizing any of the algorithms and to whom the speed is not an objective at all. The method is also good for generating solutions with small average number of moves. but it is nowhere near the god's number.

It is true that all hypercubers play Celeste. I know this because I am a "hypercuber" and I play Celeste. well technically I haven't solved a 3^4 yet but I have played Celeste therefore I am a hypercuber

Cool video and all, but when can I get my hands on a 1x1x1x1 Rubik's Cube?

" what colour are red beans" well id fuckin hope their red, right?

Is that a Gan 11 M Pro?

does the 2×2×2×1 have a gyro algorithm 🤔

Biblically accurate Rubik's cubes go brr

None of these words are in the bible 😭

Then call it a 1x2x2x2 like half of a 2x2x2x2

😂😂

atp we should just invent a machine that makes us go to the 4th dimension and ask 4d aliens to makes us hypercubes or maybe they already did

the visions that you're seeing are messages sent by higher dimensional beings they want you to become one of them or maybe you're just going crazy idk try 3¹⁰ cube to be sure

does doing these types of cubes make you understand how higher dimensions may work better cuz im obssessed with 4d and im a cuber if learning 4d cubes help I'll try to learn them😭

I'd say that HSC is better because it is web version and newer

Mate, this is 100 percent what non cubers see with a normal cube

BELT-1, EO, corner swap if on wrong side, 1LLL case solved on bottom, Oll and Pll solved on top

How different people call an classic rubiks cube: Noncubers: rubix cube Cubers: 3x3 Technical people: 3x3x3 That one person: 3 TO THE THREEEEEE

hi rowan, can you please continue the 3x3x3x3 tutorial please, i really liked the way you taught

23:05

😂😂😂😂😂

In principle you can of course make any cube in 3d (or even 2d) by just having each sticker represented in an arbitrary configurations and defining what permutations you are allowed to make. The gyros seem to be in that spirit. I'm guessing the additional design requirement is that you have to have each 4d piece represented as a single 3d piece and the challenge (beyond actually designing the gyros) is to have cubies that can simulate any 4d rotation with 3d rotations, yielding the same permutation of the stickers as the 4d rotation, right?

You can't really have 4th dimension in space. It has to be time. there are only 3 dimensions in space.

Wehr can i instal magic cube 4d

i don't deem any of these to be actually physical representations. they allow you to do illegal moves. i expected to see a cube like shape that contains the original 3x3x3

There is no 0x0 lol

What does RKT stand for?

I had EXACTLY the same thought recently because I'm a big fan of geometry! I have already got a Tetrahedron, Cube and Dodecahedron, I will get my Diansheng FTO in a few days and I want an Icosahedron... But probably it's too expensive(

Hey! Z3Cubing featured you!

I mean waterman is kinda a side by side method so Idk bout that

i love how you can see the magnets

4:53 ksp mssic

I feel like this is something I'm not supposed to see.

How is this community related to Celeste? I’m not a hypercyber yet but I play Celeste

reduction is a mathematical approach with strong roots in theoretical computer science :)

L